The unlikely friends of the Holocaust memorial killer

From the Observer

In his brutality and his obsessions, James W von Brunn was both a relic of the old far right and a sign of things to come. Before he murdered a security guard at the doors of the Washington Holocaust museum – murdered, that is, at a memorial to a mass murder he denied – he was tied into the old web of international neo-fascism. As might be predicted, he went to meetings of the American Friends of the British National party, where he could share his desire to drive the blacks and the Jews from the “white nations” with what friends he could find.

He did not seem to find many. Eighty-eight years old, living in a condo, with a broken marriage behind him, he even joined Mensa, the habitual rest home for failures with delusions of grandeur. Stephen Tyrone Johns, the security guard, who died for politely opening the door of his car, was in every respect the better man. After the killing, American newspapers decided that von Brunn was a typical white supremacist. David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klan leader, had gloated that the first black president was a “visual aid” whose presence in the White House would recruit a new generation of racists and the press quoted civil rights groups who worried understandably about how many would sign up and how violent they would be.

Yet for all his roots in neo-Nazism, von Brunn was also a transitional figure who typified a wider range of forces than I can adequately squeeze into the “far right” label. He was an enthusiastic “truther”, who went on the net to deny that the al-Qaida attacks on New York and Washington had surprised the conspirators in power who secretly controlled America. He hated Bill O’Reilly of Fox News and neocons as much as the New York Times and Obama. “It doesn’t matter that you despise Jews-neocons-Bill O’Reilly,” he declared in one of his incoherent internet postings. “You pay the kosher tax – or else you don’t eat.”

The last time I heard similar remarks was not in the back room of a Leeds pub but the elegant gardens of Christ Church College.

The nice, middle-class organisers of the Oxford Literary Festival had invited Israeli-born Gilad Atzmon who is – and you are going to have bear with me on this – a former winner of the BBC’s jazz album of the year award. He declared that “Jewish ideology is driving our planet into a catastrophe” and “the Jewish tribal mindset – left, centre and right – sets Jews aside of humanity”.

If he had been from the British National party, the festival would have had nothing to do with him, but as he was a fellow traveller of the Socialist Workers party, the literary ladies in their floral dresses and the bookish gentlemen in their ill-fitting jackets welcomed him to the quadrangles of Oxford.

I thought as I listened that, as so often in the past, what unites far left and far right is more important than what divides them, but readers may object that I am still talking only about tiny groups of extremists, who influence next to no one. The 9/11 “truthers” von Brunn joined have a far greater appeal, however. Admittedly, they do not seem appealing on first glance. In fact, they seem nutty geeks with wild eyes, who constantly film public meetings, in the hope that a member of the establishment will admit to being part of a global conspiracy in an unguarded moment.

Yet their idea that the west can only be the criminal and never be the victim of crime is everywhere. In 2003, a third of young Germans believed that al-Qaida was not a cult of death responsible for massacres.

A 2006 poll by the Pew Research Centre found that a majority of Muslims in Indonesia, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan and Pakistan denied that Arab terrorists could have carried out the 11 September attacks. Of British Muslims, 56% agreed that the hijackers were innocent and 25% went on to say “the British government was involved in some way” with the 7/7 atrocities in London.

Whenever I argue with “truthers”, I point out as gently as I can that they are the children of the Holocaust-deniers. Just as the old far right denied the crimes of the German fascists of the 1940s, so they deny the crimes of the clerical fascists of our day. Yet although I have no doubt some of them will end up in neo-Nazi parties, I sense that the majority are moving in a new direction.

In Voodoo Histories, his elegant evisceration of the paranoid mentality, David Aaronovitch points out that former fascists and communists, secular Ba’athists, radical Islamists, Russian nationalists and America firsters – people who would never have worked together in the past, and who indeed killed each other in the past – are fusing ideas and creating a new ideology. Their politics, he writes, is “a loose coalescence of impulses: anti-globalisation, broadly anti-modernist and anti-imperialist – with imperialism being inevitably and solely associated with American power”.

If you think this fusion is limited only to cranks, consider how human rights groups and secularists are having to combat new and powerful alliances the new anti-liberal ideology has encouraged. Earlier this year, the dictatorships which dominate the United Nations’ comically named Human Rights Council tried to pass a motion stating that defamation of religion should everywhere be a crime. For obvious reasons, Islamic states pushed the new blasphemy law and abused the language of liberty as they attempted to justify the punishment of Muslims and non-Muslims who criticised or mocked orthodoxy.

Strikingly, states that 20 or even 10 years ago would have been their enemies rushed to their side. Putin’s Russia, which has been engaged in the dirty war against the Islamists of Chechnya, supported the assault on dissent. As did Cuba’s communist atheists, the supposed socialists of Chávez’s Venezuela and the Brezhnevian relics from Belarus. The promise of an attack on the liberal values of freedom of speech and freedom of conscience produced a united front.

As he sat in his condo, nursing his grievances and watching his Mel Gibson movies, James W von Brunn may have seemed a relic of the fascist movements of the 20th century. But in his grubby, instinctive way, he was groping towards the new authoritarian alliances of the 21st.

Read the whole thing

9 thoughts on “The unlikely friends of the Holocaust memorial killer

  1. I may add one group to your list of lunatics distinguished by their adherence to “truther” trash: Lefebvrites and other extremist “Catholics” – I place that word in inverted commas not just because they are not members of my Church, however they may claim otherwise, but because their sectarianism and self-regard are the exact opposite of what the word “Catholic”, universal, open to the world, means. Every Catholic blog I know has a few of these trolls, obsessional about Jews and about conspiracy theories, convinced that the last few Popes were Communist stooges, and so on. They do not represent us, but they would love to. And they are – a particularly sad feature – unbelievably loquacious, piling quotation upon quotation to confirm their obsessions.

    My impression is that these people are really very few, but the rise of the Internet has given them the chance to get in touch and encourage each other. And in a bunch, as they are now, I would not regard them as altogether harmless.

  2. Oh, one thing – von Brun would not watch Mel Gibson movies. He hated Christianity with a passion, regarding it in classic Nazi style as a Jewish pollution of wholesome Aryan manhood. Perhaps you should pay attention to that little German particle in his name.

  3. Thoughtful article, highlighting some of the hypocrisies and contradictions of identity politics. One quibble – well I once thought it to be merely a quibble, but now I see it as a real problem in analysing the motives of such people.

    67 years after Hitler’s treachery with Barbarossa, Stalin’s retaliatory propaganda that the Nazis were “far right”, even though during his pact with Hitler he had acknowledged deep ideological sympathies, still has traction. Describing myself as centre right, I find the idea that my political instincts, taken to extreme, would be anything like Nazism or the BNP to be deeply offensive. The extreme extrapolation of my views would bring me to J.S.Mill, not Hitler. I want, above all, freedom – as much of it as can be commensurate with security and justice. To ask someone who has not known freedom what he thinks when he finds it, is to understand this much better.

    The far right are neo-Liberals, not Nazis or KKK supporters, and the BNP, Facsists, Nazis and Communists are all authoritarian far-left. The only differences between Communists and the others is the element of Nationalism, and it was missing this vital point that duped Stalin. Other common elements of the Left (in their instincts) involve the flawed concept of the perfectibility of Man and the elimination of individuality. This programme requires the coercion or elimination of dissent, not freedom.

    Look at the political spectrum that way, and the hate that meets the Right (of any flavour) and alliances like that between the SWP and Hamas makes much more sense. In particular, the Left Tribe hates: the USA; Tory Toffs; the Countryside Alliance; Israel (especially Likud); Orangemen; Serb Nationalists; Le Pen; Vlaams Blok; White Africans; Anglicans. If you are not one of those, the some on the Left will welcome you, particularly if you want to change the world – in what direction and with what methods seems to be less important. That is, like Red and Black ants, until their territory starts to overlap with yours.

  4. Is it possible to ‘argue’ with 9/11 ‘truthers’?

    Surely they lack the basic capacities for reason necessary for an argument? (After all, a whopping great lump of doublethink they have to manage is that an all-powerful US conspiracy is capable of contriving and covering up an intricate plot to kill 3,000 of its citizens and destroy two iconic buildings, yet is happy to sit back and let a few spotty geeks expose the whole thing). Isn’t it best just to point and laugh?

  5. All conspiracy theorists have a brain disorder. Their brains cause them to form patterns out of chaotic events.

    I once had a date with a man who seemed normal, but in the car on the way home he began to spout conspiracy theories. When I said jokingly, “Oh yeah, and all the jews were told to leave the Trade Center towers, too..,” and he replied, “That did happen,” I knew I was in big trouble.

  6. Please excuse me for belaboring a point that I made elsewhere in shorter form.

    Let’s leave aside the fact that, to the extent that the words “left” and “right” still have a meaning, this is the exact opposite of the original meaning, in which the “right” was the party of State power and the “left” the party of individual liberty.

    Let me concentrate instead on the idiotic “far-right” label. In Europe, this label is used to group together 2 polar opposites: parties which are anti-capitalist, anti-American, and antisemitic [the obvious examples being Le Pen and the BNP]; and parties which are market-liberal, pro-American, and Zionist [the obvious example being Geert Wilders]. To complicate matters further, there are parties such as the Vlaams Belang, which are, or pretend to be, part of the 2nd group, but have not managed to repudiate their connections to the 1st group.

    Of course, there is a difference between the anti-capitalist, anti-American anti-Semites of the “far-right” and those of the “far-left”: the former are, or tend to be, white supremacists, while the latter tend to be anti-white. However, the “far-right” anti-capitalists are united to the “far-left”, not only by anti-capitalism, anti-Americanism, and antisemitism, but also by intellectual genealogy. In this respect, the real eye-opener for me was neither The Road to Serfdom nor Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism [both valuable books in their different ways], but George Watson’s The Lost Literature of Socialism.

  7. Often when I read something written by someone such as Noam Chomsky, I think to myself, if the conspiracy theorists are even a little bit correct about the evil imperialist American government/Zionist global conspiracy to steal all the earth’s resources and rule the world, then everyone should just sit back and hang on for the ride, since there seems to be absolutley nothing any one person can do about any of it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s