Why are they trying to gag a top British science writer?

When chiropractors drag a science writer into the libel courts, the country has lost its backbone
The Observer, Sunday 31 May 2009

This week, Simon Singh, one of Britain’s best science writers, will decide whether to carry on playing a devilish version of Who Wants to be a Millionaire? He has already lost £100,000 defending his right to speak frankly. He could walk away. No one would think the worse of him if he did. Or he could go on and risk losing the full million by ensnaring himself in the rapacious world of an English judiciary that seems ever eager to bow to the demands of Saudi oil billionaires, Russian oligarchs and the friends of Saddam Hussein to censor critics and punish them with staggering damages and legal fees.

It seems no choice at all. Any friend Singh phoned would tell him to cut his losses and run. But if he were to turn to the audience, he would hear scientists all but screaming at him to go to the Court of Appeal and challenge a judgment that threatens the robust discussions open societies depend on.

Go read the whole thing…

4 thoughts on “Why are they trying to gag a top British science writer?

  1. Has Singh (or his team) considered the Human Rights Act as promising channel of appeal. Article 10 guarantees the right to freedom of expression, effectively our 1st Amendment, so how can it be right that a decent honest man be bankrupted for telling the truth?

    It would seem our Libel Laws, as interpreted by Eady’s ruling, are in clear breach of the convention, and thus cannot stand. Any thoughts?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s