That anti-fascist left is still absent without leave.

Todd Gitlin wrote a reply to my above review, which in my view missed every available point. You can decide for yourself by going to the Democracy site and searching for Gitlin.
Our exchange of letter in the current issue is below. Gitlin argues that he was criticised by Chomsky and the far Left in the Nineties and that excuses his uneasiness about showing solidarity with the victims of Islamo-fascism today. But that only goes to prove the argument I made in What’s Left? that extreme anti-western, anti-liberal ideas which began in obscure corners of the left in the Nineties, moved into the mainstream.
Anyway. Here is our exchange.

Issue #12, Spring 2009
Letters to the Editor
by Democracy Readers

Left, Right, Left . . .

Suppose officials in the Obama Administration are anxious to find ideas to guide America in a new direction. They might turn to Democracy and read Todd Gitlin. He certainly sounds like a man of the left. But what does he think liberals in office should do? Clearly they should not take notice of the warnings from Bernard-Henri Lévy and myself that the European left (and perhaps parts of the American left too) are going along with, or at least excusing, the far right. According to his response to my review of Lévy’s new book [“Left Is Right,” Issue #11], I assume “in black-or-white Republican fashion that those who reject a bomb-bomb foreign policy are turning cold shoulders to totalitarianism’s victims.”

I do not, and nor does Lévy. Like much of the rest of what Gitlin has produced, this is overkill, from a writer more interested in attention-seeking than fact-checking. All I have argued, here and elsewhere, is that a left that no longer shows solidarity with the victims of totalitarianism–unless, of course, that totalitarianism can somehow be said to be the “fault” of the United States–is not a left worth having. Our Obama staffers, however, will be more interested in his views on how they should handle their inevitable confrontation with totalitarian regimes and movements. Gitlin’s answer is, I think, that they should do nothing.

I say, “I think,” because it is not at all clear what Gitlin believes. After denouncing Lévy and me in the wildest language, he mutters that we may have a point. After thundering his opposition to a “bomb-bomb” foreign policy, he implies he supported the bombing of the forces of Slobodan Milosevic.

Gitlin’s slipperiness, his fear of saying anything that might bring him harsh looks from a fellow sociologist or a hurtful write-up in The Nation, was encapsulated for me in this self-regarding question about the vital conflict of our time: “If my soul is stirred by Afghan women demanding their rights, but I worry about a NATO strategy that bombs a lot of inconvenient civilians, have I gone over to the enemy?”

Well, it depends, doesn’t it? We all worry about NATO strategy, but if Gitlin only mentions women’s rights in passing, and devotes the rest of his article to attacking writers who defend them, if he cannot even pluck up the courage to say whether he wants the struggle against the Taliban to continue, then I do not think that radical Islamists’ would regard him as their deadliest foe. He does not support but he does not oppose, either–the classic position of the dilettante down through the ages.

Gitlin ends on a self-pitying note, sighing that “when Cohen warns that the American Left will soon face the same dilemmas as the French, that American liberals after Bush run the risk of sliding down the Europeans’ morally squalid slope, he fails to grasp how marginal intellectual life is altogether on this side of the ocean.” If he is the best the American intellectual life can come up with, I can’t say I’m surprised. For the sake of America and the world, the Obama Administration should marginalize him, too.

Nick Cohen
London, United Kingdom

Todd Gitlin replies:

According to Nick Cohen, I fall short of his exacting fact-checking standards. But he himself thinks that I “imply” that I supported the bombing of Milosevic’s forces during the Bosnian genocide–when 0.45 seconds with Google would have demonstrated that I did support it before, during, and after. For the record, if it matters, I do agree–no great shakes– that “it is always wrong to stone women to death” and, more generally, to “abandon . . . solidarity with those victims of oppression whose suffering does not fit into the ‘anti-imperialist’ worldview.” A bit more Googling would disclose that Professor Chomsky’s epigones have frequently had it out for me for precisely that reason, though perhaps I have declared my solidarity in less Manichaean terms than Cohen prefers. The trouble is that bombast in the name of solidarity is not a policy.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “That anti-fascist left is still absent without leave.

  1. Re Gitlin. Saying intellectual life is so marginalised in someplace would be ‘funny’ if it were said of a sitcom featuring three bored men just constantly watching poor sitcom’s on the telly, while farting and giving each smell a name. But when it is said of a country, and one like that of America, well, then I fear it is a case of that strange and weird way men (supposedly) of brains cannot resist becoming pompous, whatever the circumstance.

  2. 老牌全讯网是最权威和最全面的博彩公司等网上博彩网址导航,含百家乐、皇冠网、太阳城、娱乐城等信誉的博彩通博彩网址导航。找全讯网,上老牌全讯网,打造最值得信赖的全讯网导航.

  3. 莫桑钻-莫桑石13715159994-莫桑钻石-美神莱-美神来-魔星钻-莫桑裸石裸钻批发零售代理-moissanite-charlescolvard-charles&colvard-charlesandcolvard-mosang-mosangzuan-mosangshi-mosangzuanshi-碳化硅-碳和硅-碳硅石-美国查尔斯科瓦有限公司大中华机构-美国诗思有限公司-深圳市莫桑钻石有限公司-莫桑国际-亚太莫桑总经销-中国大陆莫桑钻石总代理-莫桑石总公司-美国C3公司-Henri Moissan博士-带腰码-GIA国际认证蓝晶卡-GIA查询验证-南非钻-moissanitediamond-mosangdiamond-人造钻石-更多火彩 查而斯科瓦莫桑钻.

  4. 苦荞属蓼科植物,是荞麦的一种,又称鞑靼荞麦,为一年生草本植物。苦荞适应性强不挑土地,耐旱耐寒,适宜在气候寒冷或土壤贫瘠的地方栽培,而且生长时间短,60~80天老练。苦荞老练后,叶变黄,籽粒变黑呈三棱卵圆形瘦果,鳞次栉比地摞在秆上。苦荞一身是宝,除籽粒经碾磨粉碎供食用外,嫩叶可作蔬菜,荞秆则可作牲畜的饲料。过去,大家通常只食用甜荞,苦荞则因清苦粗糙、适口性差而长时间被视为低劣物,通常只作为饲料进行栽培。近年来,清新自然的饮食方式和低热量的安康食品逐步成为了一种趋势,五谷杂粮愈来愈受大家的青睐,其间,苦荞更是成了大家餐桌上的新宠。最近几年的研讨标明:苦荞所含的蛋白复合物能提高人体抗氧化酶的活性,对体内的脂质过氧化物则有一定的铲除效果,而且苦荞所含的可溶性粗纤维和不可溶性粗纤维能使人胃里面的食物排空速度下降,减慢人体对碳水化合物的吸收速度,然后起到“肠胃和血液清洁工”的效果。此外,经常食用苦荞,还可起到推迟机体 变老、润泽皮肤的效果。在所有谷物中,只有荞麦富含丰富的生物类黄酮,而苦荞所含的生物类黄酮又比通常的荞麦高出十几倍,要知道,这生物类黄酮是防治慢性病的新宠,因为它是 天然的抗氧化剂,而且能推进胰岛细胞的康复,改善糖耐量,下降血液的粘度。所以说长时间食用苦荞或许喝苦荞茶,就能调理人体的血糖、血脂,然后起到一种两层保健的效果。苦荞茶.

  5. As a professional stone crusher and grinding mill manufacturer in China, Zoonyee Machinery has released many kinds stone crushing plants for the contractors and final users. The production capacity of this one nuit Granite crushing line can achieve 260t/h -330t/h. The features are: high efficiency, low cost, high quality products, low energy consumption and so on.jaw crusher

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s